Value Packs / Retail / Inventory & Availability Guardian / Wisdom

Which states are running In-Stock % furthest below target this week, and how many units of demand sit behind each of those gaps?

N
Done See how Wisdom analyzed this

Which states are furthest off target

IN A NUTSHELL

Three states are outside the target each is held to, and they are not the same size of problem. New York is at 88.2% against its 96.0% target — a 7.8-point gap — with 2.41M units of trailing demand behind it. Georgia is next at 93.8% against 96.4%, a 2.6-point gap on 1.86M units, and Ohio at 94.6% against 96.2% on 1.32M. On the size of the gap New York is three times Georgia. On the demand behind it, only about a third bigger.

In-Stock % against each state’s own target, by state

NYGAOHBELOW EACH STATE’S OWN TARGETNew York2.41M units of demand · target 96.0%−7.8 ppGeorgia1.86M units · target 96.4%−2.6 ppOhio1.32M units · target 96.2%−1.6 ppThe other 45 statesat or above their own target

Three states are shaded and New York is much the darkest — the target is on each row, because New York is held to 96.0% and Georgia to 96.4%, and one number across the three would hide that.

Each state has one category further below its target than the rest of it: grocery and beverages in New York at 86.4%, chilled and dairy in Georgia at 91.2%, and household and cleaning in Ohio at 92.4%. New York’s is the worst of the three and sits in its largest state by demand.

Ask a follow-up

How has In-Stock % in New York grocery and beverages moved week by week against target? How has Georgia chilled and dairy moved week by week? Which categories are at or above target in all three states?

How has In-Stock % in New York grocery and beverages moved week by week against target?

N
Done See how Wisdom analyzed this

Five weeks outside the band, and still widening

IN A NUTSHELL

New York grocery and beverages sat between 95.5% and 96.9% for six weeks, inside the range we expect. From week 37 it has been below that range every week — 94.9%, and lower every week since to 86.4% at week 41, against a 96.0% target. The weekly steps have grown: 1.2 points at the first week below, 2.6 last week. From that first week below to now it has given up 8.5 points, across five weeks in a row outside the range.

In-Stock % against target · New York grocery and beverages

85%90%95%100%week 37 — first week beloww31w33w35w37w39w41latest weekIn-Stock %Expected range

In-stock left its band at week 37 and has moved further from it every week since — the gap to target widens from 1.1 to 9.6 points across the five weeks, with no week returning inside.

Before week 37 it moved by up to 1.4 points a week and never left the range. Since then it has fallen 1.2, 1.5, 2.2, 2.2 and 2.6 points — further down each week, and never back inside.

Wisdom noticed

“That’s the second question in a row on New York grocery and beverages. Shall I save it as your scope?”
Yes, save it as my scope No, ask me each time

Ask a follow-up

Is the stock missing altogether, or is it sitting at the warehouse? Have the units sold in these categories changed over the same weeks? Which New York stores are furthest below target?

Is the stock missing altogether, or is it sitting at the warehouse?

N
Done See how Wisdom analyzed this

The stock exists — most of it is not on the shelf

IN A NUTSHELL

Mostly stock that exists and has not reached the shelf. Across these categories the warehouse holds 4.2 weeks of supply while the shelf holds 0.6 — a 3.6-week gap — and 31 of the 38 stores below target show that same shape. Those 31 sit at a median 4.1 days since the last replenishment, against 1.8 days for the stores in these categories still on target. The other 7 are short at both ends, with under 1.0 week at the warehouse on the same items.

Weeks of cover, shelf against warehouse · by store group

Weeks left on the shelfBelow targetWeeks left in the warehouseWaiting at the warehouse31 storesEmpty at both ends7 storesStocked normally176 stores0.0 wks2.0 wks4.0 wks6.0 wks

The 31 stores hold six times as much at the warehouse as on the shelf — a 3.6-week gap — while the seven beside them have under a week at either end.

For the 31, the stock is already bought and already in the region — it is 4.1 days since anything moved to the shelf. For the 7, there is under a week of cover at the warehouse too, so there is nothing upstream to send.

Ask a follow-up

Put the weekly stock report together. Which of the 31 stores has the most stock waiting for it? How long has each store been waiting for a replenishment?

Put the weekly stock report together.

N
Done See how Wisdom analyzed this

The report lists every store that is short of stock, what it is short of, and whether that stock already exists at its warehouse or was never bought. One row per store, so each one can be picked up by whoever acts on it.

XLSX

stores_below_target_w41.xlsx

One row per store, grouped by who acts on it — the warehouse, buying, or watch only. New York, read to week 41.

38 KB · 26 rows · 3 states · 11 weeks

Download

Ask a follow-up

Which entries changed since last week? Can I see this grouped by store rather than by team? Which entries cleared, and what cleared them? Which categories sit behind each store’s shortfall?